AUG v3 vs AARRR pirate metrics — which growth framework fits solo SaaS founders?

Dave McClure's AARRR is the canonical 5-factor pirate-metrics framework (Acquisition · Activation · Retention · Referral · Revenue). The AUG v3 framework — built on top of AARRR's shoulders — adds Engagement, Performance, and a multiplicative composite score. Here's a side-by-side honest comparison.

TL;DR

Comparison table

DimensionAARRR (Pirate Metrics)AUG v3Winner
Factor count5 (Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Referral, Revenue)7 (Acquisition, Activation, Engagement, Retention, Advocacy, Monetization, Performance)AUG — separates Engagement from Retention (different signals, different fixes) and includes Performance as a first-class growth multiplier
Composite scoringNo native composite — each metric tracked separatelyGeometric mean × 10 → 0–100 composite. Multiplicative: zero in any factor near-zeros the wholeAUG — single number to compare across products + over time; honest about multiplicativity
Performance as a factorNot included — Core Web Vitals treated as engineering concernFactor 7. Real-user LCP/INP/CLS/TTFB measured; every 1s of LCP = ~7% conversion lostAUG — Performance is a growth multiplier in 2026, not a technical detail
Engagement vs Retention splitBoth folded into "Retention"Separated. Engagement = depth-of-session (10 measurable signals); Retention = return-rate (D1/D7/D30 cohorts). Different signals, different fixesAUG — fixing PV/session ≠ fixing D30 return; conflating loses leverage
Math floor for monetizationImplicit — must be derivedExplicit: revenue_ceiling = sessions × PV × RPM ÷ 1000. Below €20/mo ceiling, monetization work is operator-time burnAUG — funnel-order discipline is enforced numerically; founders stop pricing-tweaking traffic-starved sites
Hard rejection of dark patternsNot addressed — framework is value-neutralBuilt in: dark-pattern multiplier = -1.0 (immutable). Manipulative retention tactics that spike D1-D7 but collapse D30 are filtered out before scoringAUG — short-term retention hacks are net-negative; framework refuses to credit them
Stage applicabilityBest for early-stage products figuring out the funnel basicsBest for solo founders running zero-marketing-budget SaaS at any stage; explicit operator-time disciplineDepends — AARRR for first 6 weeks of a new product; AUG for ongoing diagnostic across portfolio
Tooling integrationGeneric — works with any analytics stackSpecific to solo-founder stack: Plausible + GSC + IndexNow + llms.txt + Cloudflare Web Analytics + PageSpeed InsightsAARRR for tool-agnostic teams; AUG for solo founders who want a specific opinionated stack

How AARRR maps into AUG v3

The frameworks are compatible. If your team already tracks AARRR, the migration is a simple decomposition:

When to use which

Use AARRR when: you're explaining the funnel to a non-technical co-founder, sketching on a whiteboard, or building your first analytics dashboard. AARRR's 5 factors are the right level of abstraction for early-stage clarity.

Use AUG v3 when: you have shipped a product, have analytics live, and need to know which single factor to fix this week to compound the rest. AUG's 7-factor decomposition + composite score is built for ongoing diagnostic across a SaaS portfolio.

Use both: AARRR for cross-team communication; AUG for weekly internal diagnostic.

Run your audit

See your AUG score in 60 seconds. Performance auto-measured via Google PageSpeed Insights; the other 6 factors self-reported against the published rubric.

Run free audit