Compare 2 SaaS products side-by-side
Score 2 of your products across the 7 AUG v3 factors. The tool shows per-factor winner + composite delta + tier classification for each. Useful for: prioritizing which product gets the next session of operator time, identifying which product is “leakier” on which factor, or sanity-checking a co-founder's gut call against the rubric.
Site A
0.78
Zombie
Site B
0.78
Zombie
| Factor | Site A | Site B | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acquisition | 5 | 5 | — |
| Activation | 5 | 5 | — |
| Engagement | 5 | 5 | — |
| Retention | 5 | 5 | — |
| Advocacy | 5 | 5 | — |
| Monetization | 5 | 5 | — |
| Performance | 5 | 5 | — |
Reading the comparison: the multiplicative composite means the site with higher weakest-factor often beats the site with higher highs. If both sites score 5+ across the board, they'll both land in “Mid-tier” — the delta between 5 vs 7 is bigger than the delta between 8 vs 10.
Need full-data automation (PSI auto-measure for both sites + cross-site rollups + weekly tracking)? Multi-site fleet dashboard is a Pro tier feature — coming Q3 2026.
How compare differs from single-site audit
- Self-report only — performance is scored manually here (vs auto-measured via Google PageSpeed Insights on /audit/). Saves time when comparing multiple sites.
- No deep-dive output — you get scores + composite delta + per-factor winners, not the “single weakest factor + 10 recommended fixes” output from the main audit.
- Honest about ties — the multiplicative formula means raising a weak factor lifts the composite far more than improving an already-strong one. The delta column shows where each site has structural advantage.
For the full 7-factor diagnostic on a single product (auto-measured Performance + named weakest factor + recommended fix), use the single-site audit.
Want full multi-site fleet dashboard?
Multi-site dashboards with auto-measured Performance across N sites + weekly drift alerts + cross-site rollups are a Pro tier feature. Coming Q3 2026. See pricing for the roadmap.